Club member Anita is a single Mum who works for a business in West Yorkshire that’s open all hours. It’s a 20 minute drive from home and clearly she needs a reliable car to get there in all weathers. She has twin daughters and uses her cherished Land Rover Freelander to tow her daughter’s horsebox to and from events.
Propshaft failings
When her car started playing up this time last year, a friend recommended White Cat Garage in Pontefract when her usual garage was unable to do the work at the time. Anita isn’t a mechanical expert, she trusted this recommendation and the business website looked professional (as it happened, ALL the logos purporting to be memberships of respectable organisations were fake, including our female friendly garage network).
So she left her car with White Cat Garage for a couple of days (no courtesy car was available which was a logistical problem of course…) whilst they diagnosed the problem as the propshaft. Anita told them to do this work and paid a bill for £935.81 including tyres of which £568.55 was for repairs to the propshaft.
About four months later her car started to play up again…
Her usual garage diagnosed a front propshaft bearing problem this time and told her to go back to White Cat as this was likely an associated problem.
White Cat did some remedial work for free.
Some four months later, the same thing happened again. “You have to go back to White Cat” her usual garage told her. Again White Car repaired this for free.
A few months on, the final straw for Anita was a worrying whining noise underneath the car AGAIN. Was this a safety problem too?
A second propshaft repair opinion
Her father suggested she take the Freelander to FourPlus4, a Land Rover specialist in Leeds, for a second opinion.
Earlier this year they confirmed that:
+ Anita’s car had been repaired using secondhand parts
+ her diesel powered Freelander should have had a propshaft with an integrated damper fitted; White Cat had fitted one without ie for a petrol engine
+ the car was effectively in two wheel drive all the time, when she needed four wheel drive as well
+ the offside brake lines were corroded; a significant safety concern
+ they (FourPlus4) would charge some £1000 to rectify this.
Anita’s financial dilemma
Could White Cat’s work have caused these ongoing problems, Anita wondered?
Did White Cat fit used parts that had originally been fitted to a petrol powered Freelander? That would certainly explain the ‘missing’ damper.
Reluctantly, Anita went back to White Cat Garage yet again.
This time she explained to their mechanic what FourPlus4 had told her, that she was worried about the whirring noise, that she needed a safe and reliable car for her job and that she couldn’t afford £1000 to put this work right.
They both went for a short drive during which the mechanic said everything sounded and seemed fine. According to him, the car didn’t need a damper fitted, he’d used new parts but he couldn’t quite place the receipt to prove this (and still hasn’t) and claimed that the car drove perfectly alright.
His verdict was simple.
“Listen luv, get in your car, forget all about any problems and just drive it.”
So Anita turned to us for advice.
Our advice was that this recommended course of action would almost certainly have led to the destruction of an extremely expensive engine unit ie the intermediate reduction drive. And that would then have led to the car being scrapped due to the high cost of that replacement unit.
This was further complicated by White Cat being unable to prove the authenticity of the ‘new’ parts they claimed to have fitted. Whilst they couldn’t remember the name of the supplier, or find the bill, remarkably, they could remember the approximate location of their premises…??
Our advice to Anita was to get the problem fixed by someone who will use the right (new) parts and knows what they are doing ie FourPlus4 in Leeds.
So Anita had no option but to pay nearly £1000 to rectify the work that White Cat Garage had carried out.
Misleading business logos
Whilst our helpdesk was advising Anita about her rights and the best way forward we noticed that the garage was claiming to be a member of FOXY’s female friendly garage network.
It wasn’t then and never had been.
It was also advertising membership of the Trading Standards Institute Motor Codes Service & Repair scheme. A quick phone call confirmed it had been a member but was no longer.
The same was true of the AA, RAC and Check-a-Trade approved logo schemes – nobody knew of White Cat.
As we always do, we wrote to White Cat to give them the opportunity to defend themselves. They have not replied. We were not surprised.
We are therefore telling Anita’s story here so that other FOXY Lady Drivers in Pontefract can learn from her experience.
White Cat’s Liability
In this instance Anita dealt with all this on her own and freely admits she is not mechanically-minded. Seeing how stressed she had become, her father got involved. This added to his stress whilst undergoing cancer treatment.
Anita then joined the Club and we are helping her sort this out.
In our recent letter to White Cat Garage we held them responsible for her remedial bill of £999.87 for propshaft related repairs plus an added £250 towards her stress.
Anyone who knows their stuff will know that a damper needs to be fitted to a prop shaft on a diesel Freelander. This caused all the problems Anita experienced, hence the fault and financial responsibility here lies fairly and squarely with White Cat Garage.
__________________________________________
We hope this blog will encourage them to do the right thing for Anita. Otherwise this post will remain online, hashtagged ‘garage’ and ‘Pontefract’ and on our internal blacklist for Club members.
Just for the record, it seems that the logos used claiming to be members of the schemes I’ve mentioned have now been removed from White Cat’s website. Their very presence suggested that this business was prepared to pass themselves off as an approved garage, which they never were. This spoke volumes about their ethics.
All that remains now, for them to do the decent thing here, is to refund Anita as stated in our letter dated 22 April 2015.
We continue to await their contact on Anita’s behalf.
FOXY
PS To comment on this story please EITHER email info@foxyladydrivers.com OR use Twitter @FOXYTweets.